They never actually say that their house is the last one on the left, which I think they should of either incorporated it into the dialogue or changed the title. I was thinking this movie happened in the suburbs, not some lake town and some isolated lake house. The movie was graphic, and the acting was good. The escaped convict's girlfriend was an irritating actress... they should have cast someone else. For a horror movie, they still seem to incorporate boobies, which quite frankly was unnecessary to the story or the direction of the plot. I thought it took away because it was just a distraction... not to mention the last image they show of the girlfriend at the end and its change of focus. What you think are good natured protagonists being antagonized by these foul bandits is not the case. And in that respect I actually didn't like the movie because of the reaction of the parents of Mary. I especially did not like the last scene.
3 comments:
Wait a miiiinute.. are you saying if your daughter was raped and left for dead.. But somehow made it home.. And the people that left her that way are on your property.. That you wouldn't attack?
I would probably knock them out, bind them up and then get the police. Otherwise I would be no better than those people by doing what they do and labelling it as revenge to justify their actions. I just don't get the whole shooting someone in the eye ball. Totally didn't expect that one.
Yeeeeah yeah.. I understand your point. The whole 'an eye for an eye makes the world blind' theory. I don't think I would have the restraint to not murder them though.
The eyeball shot was strange.. Probably did that so you would focus on a different body part.. Just tossing that out there!!
Post a Comment